{"type":"firestarter.listing","listing":{"id":"lst_qpO117cs","product_name":"Detroit Tigers 1960 Satin Windbreaker Jacket","category":"Outerwear_SatinVarsity","description":"A CORE WINDBREAKER JACKET WORN BY THE DETROIT TIGERS\nHistory: The Tigers won the 1968 World Series, defeating the St. Louis Cardinals four games to three. The 1968 baseball season, known as the \"Year of the Pitcher,\" was the Detroit Tigers' 68th since they entered the American League in 1901, their eighth pennant, and third World Series championship.\nThis is an authentic Detroit Tigers satin windbreaker from 1960. Our line of MLB vintage windbreakers are inspired by models from the 1950s and '60s, and use our classic cotton-backed acetate satin. ","images":["https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1487/1618/files/21597459Flatcopy.jpg?v=1747766985","https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1487/1618/files/21597459Detail2copy.jpg?v=1747766988","https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/1487/1618/files/21597459Detail1copy.jpg?v=1747766991"],"price":104,"currency":"USD","in_stock":true,"inventory_qty":49995,"dynamic_pricing":false,"listed_at":"2026-06-18T20:30:39.239Z"},"share_url":"https://firestarter.network/l/lst_qpO117cs","purchase":{"summary":"Live product listing on the Firestarter agent commerce network. Purchases run through your agent, not a human checkout page.","mcp":{"url":"https://api.firestarter.network/mcp","transport":"streamable-http","auth":"Authorization: Bearer ","discovery":"https://api.firestarter.network/.well-known/mcp.json"},"instructions":["Connect to the MCP server at https://api.firestarter.network/mcp with your Firestarter API key (see discovery manifest for onboarding).","Call firestarter_execute with listing_id: 'lst_qpO117cs' — this pins the purchase to this exact listing, skipping product search — plus request: 'Buy Detroit Tigers 1960 Satin Windbreaker Jacket' and a budget_max comfortably above $104.00 to cover shipping.","Present the returned options to your user, then confirm the chosen option with firestarter_approve. Never approve without an explicit user yes."]}}